Recent analysis by Reeves in the Mitchell Institute’s “Charting a Path to Space Superiority: The Cross-Domain Imperative” identifies the need for centralized command and control (C2) of counterspace capabilities under U.S. Space Command to ensure unity of effort. However, Reeves’s critique of the United States Army’s development of counterspace capabilities fundamentally misunderstands the Army’s role within the joint force structure. The paper mischaracterizes the Army’s efforts as building a mini-space force and perpetuates the false narrative that the Army independently commands and controls its counterspace systems. In reality, the Army operates precisely within the joint C2 framework that Reeves advocates for, presenting forces to combatant commands that derive their authorities directly from the President through the Unified Command Plan.

To continue reading this article:

Register now to read
3 free articles this month.

You’ll also receive our weekly Editor’s Choice, SpaceNews This Week and Opinions newsletters. Opt-out at any time.

Sign in to an existing account

Get unlimited access to SpaceNews.com, the SpaceNews app and our digital monthly magazine for less than $5 per week.

$280

Cancel anytime. Sales tax may apply. No refunds. Terms and conditions apply.

See all subscription options

Col. Pete Atkinson is a principal space advisor at the headquarters of the Department of the Army, and a public administration and policy doctoral student at Old Dominion University.